Image credit: Microsoft Bing Image Creator

AI is revolutionizing many fields, and the analysis of H&E histology is no exception. This classic method, used for over a century by pathologists, has now entered the digital age. It offers new opportunities for AI to assist in diagnostics and research. However, adapting these advances to histology in a point-of-care setting brings new challenges like scarce labeled data and variations across devices and facilities.

AI in the Lab: Automation and Discovery

In the laboratory, AI’s role in histology is relatively advanced. H&E-stained slides, the gold standard for diagnostic histology, are increasingly digitized, providing a rich dataset for AI models to analyze. This has enabled AI to support pathologists by automating tasks like tumor detection, mitosis counting, and tumor grading. These tasks, while crucial, can be time-consuming and repetitive. AI can perform them faster and with a level of precision that supports pathologists in focusing on more complex diagnostic challenges.

Beyond automation, AI is also pushing the boundaries of discovery in laboratory histology. New applications are emerging where AI models analyze H&E whole slide images to predict genetic mutations, identify molecular subtypes, or even predict a tumor’s response to specific treatments. These applications, though promising, require extensive datasets and are largely experimental right now. However, they hold significant potential for enhancing clinical trials, companion diagnostics, and drug discovery.

The Challenges of AI for Point-of-Care Histology

While AI’s role in laboratory histology is advancing rapidly, applying these technologies in a point-of-care setting presents a unique set of challenges. Unlike the controlled environments of laboratories, point-of-care applications often involve new imaging technologies.

One of the most pressing challenges in AI for point-of-care histology is the scarcity of data. While there are now large datasets of H&E whole slide images, new imaging technologies used in point-of-care scenarios often come with only a fraction of that data. This limitation makes it difficult to train AI models effectively, as the diversity and quantity of training data are crucial for developing robust algorithms. Additionally, the labels used for training these models can be weak or imprecise, further complicating the task.

Another significant challenge is the variability in imaging conditions. For H&E, a tissue slide imaged on different scanners or in different labs will produce different tissue coloring even though the underlying biological information is the same. These variations can disrupt AI models if they are not trained to accommodate them. In point-of-care settings, there is a higher likelihood of these or other variations like the varying experience levels of technicians, which will impact the reliability of AI models.

Bridging the Gap: Developing Robust AI Solutions

To address these challenges, a robust AI development process is essential. The first step involves carefully selecting the problem to be solved and defining clear metrics for success. For instance, if the goal is to detect cancer in images, the model must achieve a pre-defined level of sensitivity and specificity.

Data collection is the next critical step. Given the variability in point-of-care settings, establishing a standard imaging protocol can help ensure more consistent image quality. While it’s impossible to control all variations, standardization will make it easier to develop AI models that generalize well to different environments.

Understanding the specific data challenges for your application is also crucial. Whether it’s limited data, unreliable labels, or significant variations, these factors must be considered when selecting and implementing algorithms. AI model development is a scientific process that requires hypothesis testing, experimentation, and iteration. You may discover new challenges along the way.

Validation is particularly important for medical applications. Models must be tested on external cohorts—images collected from different patients, devices, and locations—to ensure they perform well in real-world scenarios. Only through rigorous validation can we be confident that an AI model will work reliably across various settings.

Finally, deployment and ongoing monitoring are crucial. Once an AI model is integrated into a product, it’s not the end of the process. AI models must be monitored for changes in input data and performance over time, with the capability to retrain using new data as needed. This ensures that the model remains effective and relevant.

The Future of AI in Point-of-Care Histology

While AI is already making significant contributions to laboratory histology, its application in point-of-care settings is still in its infancy. Overcoming the challenges of data scarcity, variability, and validation will enable AI to play an increasingly important role in point-of-care histology. For example, the possibility of using AI models trained on laboratory H&E data to analyze synthetic H&E images in point-of-care settings is an exciting area of research. If successful, such advancements could lead to faster diagnoses and improved patient care, making AI an indispensable tool for point-of-care histology.


Want to receive regular computer vision insights for pathology delivered straight to your inbox?

Sign up for Computer Vision Insights